Questions? Contact us:
[email protected]

What is Noise Shaping?

Quick Answer

Noise shaping is the combination of dithering and equalization, used to both cover quantization noise, and push any noise created by dithering into less perceivable areas of the frequency spectrum. With the use of noise shaping, dithering can be applied, while theoretically reducing the overall perceivable noise floor.

Noise Shaping in Detail

Since the introduction of digital quantization and sampling, engineers have sought to remedy the negative effects of inaccurate quantization, or quantization error, and the noise it generates.

Digital recording has its shortcomings - quantization noise being one of them.

Digital recording has its shortcomings - quantization noise being one of them.

Although the best way to reduce this noise is to record at a higher bit depth, and to maintain that bit depth through the production and distribution process, this option is just now becoming a possibility.

For years, engineers had to make do with the technical limitations of their digital systems - this meant recording at 16-bit, and reducing the bit depth to 8-bit when necessary. Throughout this process, dithering, and noise-shaping became a common tool to mask the negative effects of quantization error, to increase the dynamic range, and to reduce the perceivable noise floor.

Older digital recorders and processers truly needed dithering due to inaccurate quantization and lower bit depths.

Older digital recorders and processers truly needed dithering due to inaccurate quantization and lower bit depths.

Today, these practices are still upheld. They may not always be entirely necessary, but understanding them means understanding an important aspect of digital recording, and digital recording history.

Furthermore, delving into this topic reveals highly important information regarding the workings of the inner ear, and the perceptual science behind listening to music. Although this may seem like a dry topic, understanding it will absolutely help you as an audio engineer and musician so definitely read on if that’s something which interests you.

The mechanisms of the inner ear, and the outer ear's shape affect how we perceive sound sources.

The mechanisms of the inner ear, and the outer ear's shape affect how we perceive sound sources.

To best understand what noise shaping is, we should start by understanding how we perceive sound, then what dithering is and why it’s used, and then lastly, what noise-shaping is, and how it ties into these two former topics.

We’ll be looking into when to use dithering, when not to, and how noise-shaping may affect and influence these decisions. This way, you’ll be able to make informed decisions during your mastering process.

If you have a mix you need mastered, and you’re not sure how to master it yourself - send it to us here:

Get a Free Mastered Sample of Your Mix

We'll master it for you, and send you a free mastered sample of that mix.

Let’s begin with the “Fletcher-Munson Curve.”

What is the Fletcher-Munson Curve?

The Fletcher-Munson Curve, also known as the Equal-Loudness Contour, is the measurement of the sound pressure (SPL) needed to created an equally perceived loudness across the full frequency spectrum. The Fletcher Munson Curve demonstrates how our ears affect our perception of sound sources in a unique manner.

What does the Fletcher-Munson Curve look like?

At first glance, the Fletcher-Munson curve is difficult to understand.

At first glance, the Fletcher-Munson curve is difficult to understand.

When looking at this chart, it can be a little difficult to decipher what’s exactly happening, so let’s break it down.

On the left, you see the SPL or the loudness of a signal measured in dB. This makes up your y-axis or your vertical axis.

On the y-axis is the dB

On the y-axis is the dB

On the bottom, you see the frequency response, from 10Hz. to 100kHz. left to right respectively. This makes up your x-axis of your horizontal axis.

On the x-axis is the frequency

On the x-axis is the frequency

The red lines that you see curving from left to right, indicate how loud a signal needs to be in dB SPL, to be perceived equally when listened to. The unit used to denote the perceived loudness of the signal is the “Phon” which can be seen above each red curve.

In the middle are the 'Phon' curves

In the middle are the 'Phon' curves

So for example, if you wanted to hear 100Hz at 60 Phon, the loudness in dB SPL would need to be a little less than 80dB. To find this answer, look at the 60 Phon curve, and see where it alines with 100Hz. Where the 60 Phon red curve and 100Hz. intersect will show the dB SPL needed to create a perceived 60 Phon.

The intersections of frequency and phon indicate the necessary dB

The intersections of frequency and phon indicate the necessary dB

So why is this important?

Well, it shows that our ears do not translate sounds in a linear fashion - in other words, the sound that goes in, isn’t always the sound that is perceived.

That being said, you can observe that lower frequencies need to be louder to be perceived at the same volume as some higher frequencies.

For example, if you’d like to hear that same 100Hz tone at 60 Phon, it needs to be nearly 20dB louder than 1kHz to be perceived as the same volume. As you can imagine, this has huge implications for mixing, mastering, and perceptual sciences.

As you also may have imagined, this will influence how dithering is implemented and how noise-shaping is used in conjunction with dithering.

What is Dithering and Why is it Used?

As stated briefly in the section Noise Shaping in Detail, dithering is used to cover up quantization noise.

Quantization noise occurs due to quantization error. Quantization error is the difference between the actual amplitude of an analog signal, and the available bits of information that amplitude can be rounded to.

With that said, the greater the bit-depth, the more accurate a signal’s amplitude can be quantized. Greater accuracy will result in less quantization error and less noise created from this error.

So, a 24-bit file has 16,777,215 values an amplitude can be quantized to, whereas 16-bit and 8-bit recordings have 65,536 values and 6502 values respectively. Again, the greater number of values will result in a more accurately quantized signal, and ultimately less noise.

Of these 3 different bit-depths, a 24-bit file will have the least amount of quantization noise, whereas an 8-bit file will have the most.

Dithering is the process of adding what is essentially white noise into a signal, to mask and randomize the effects of quantization distortion. Ideally, this process will result in a lower noise floor, and create a greater perceived dynamic range (this occurs more so at low bit depths).

Dithering is very valuable at lower bit-depths.

Dithering is very valuable at lower bit-depths.

The reason masking and randomizing quantization noise is so important, is because along with noise, quantization error generates high order harmonics.

The red line above represents the small amount of noise generated from quantization distortion. This occurs when truncating your higher bit-depth files to lower ones.

The red line above represents the small amount of noise generated from quantization distortion. This occurs when truncating your higher bit-depth files to lower ones.

These harmonics are unpleasant sounding, and are easily perceived since they directly correlate to the fundamental frequency from which they were derived.

Introducing noise to cover or mask these harmonics randomizes the relationship between these harmonics and the fundamental, making them harder to perceive.

If you’d like to hear these harmonics, check out our blog post that details different distortion types:

What Distortion is Actually Doing to Your Mix

It goes over various forms of harmonic generation, and shows what bit depth distortion looks and sounds like.

And if you’d like to learn more about dithering, when to use it, and how it applies to mastering, check out our blog post on the topic:

What is Dithering?

It’s full of detailed information on dithering, and when dithering may not even be needed.

When dithering is combined with equalization that keeps the Fletcher-Munson Curve in mind, we create what is commonly known as noise shaping.

How is Noise Shaping Accomplished?

As just stated, noise shaping is combining dithering with equalization. This equalization is done with how we perceive sound in mind, and how that affects the perceivable noise floor.

By using subtractive equalization on frequencies we can easily hear, and using additive equalization on frequencies we cannot easily hear, dithering can be applied while being less easily perceived.

Typically this means that frequencies between 500Hz and 5kHz are attenuated, while frequencies above 6kHz are amplified. Again, this results in roughly the same amount of dithering noise applied, but the frequencies are now attenuated in areas where our ears are more sensitive, and amplified in areas which are more difficult to hear.

With that in mind, let’s look at some different, perhaps recognizable dithering types to examine what they mean, and what type of noise shaping is being applied.

POW-R #1:

Although not labeled as a noise shaping dither, POW-r #1 does include some shaping.

Although not labeled as a noise shaping dither, POW-r #1 does include some shaping.

Flat dither has a flat frequency response. This means that no noise shaping has been applied to the dithering noise. However, in this particular algorithm, some noise shaping has been applied above 15kHz.

POW-R #2:

POW-r #2 has gradual and subtle shaping.

POW-r #2 has gradual and subtle shaping.

POW-R #2 is attenuated from 2kHz to 8kHz. At 8kHz. the noise is amplified roughly 15dB between 8kHz and 14kHz. There's an additional 5dB amplified between 16kHz and 20kHz.

POW-R #3:

Many report POW-r #3 sounds more noticeable.

Many report POW-r #3 sounds more noticeable.

POW-R #3 is attenuated drastically around between 3kHz and 4kHz, and then gradually amplified back to unity between 5kHz and 9kHz. It dips again between 12kHz and 14kHz and is then amplified drastically between 16kHz and 20kHz by roughly 35dB.

This algorithm is a bit more extreme in its equalization curve, or noise shaping, and may result in more perceived noise despite its intention to do the opposite.

UV22HR:

This dither is relatively flat until 18kHz.

This dither is relatively flat until 18kHz.

UV22HR is created by Apogee, and is relatively flat between 1kHz and 18kHz, although it should be noted that these frequencies are quieter than Flat TPDF Dither by roughly 5dB. At 18kHz the noise is amplified drastically by about 30dB

FabFilter Basic :

FabFilter Basic provides very subtle noise shaping.

FabFilter Basic provides very subtle noise shaping.

FabFilter Basic is relatively flat until 7kHz. From 7kHz. to 20kHz. the noise is gradually amplified by 10dB.

FabFilter Optimized :

This option has more intense shaping.

This option has more intense shaping.

FabFilter Optimized is flat until 3kHz. From 3kHz to 7kHz. the amplitude is increased gradually by 10dB. From 7kHz. to 14kHz. it is again flat, at which point the amplitude increases drastically by 25dB until reaching 20kHz.

FabFilter Weighted :

FabFilter Weighted has a similar shape to POW-r #3.

FabFilter Weighted has a similar shape to POW-r #3.

FabFilter Weighted remains flat until 6kHz. From 6kHz to 10kHz. the amplitude is increased by 10dB. From 11kHz. to 14kHz. it dips by 5dB. And at 14kHz to 20kHz it increases in gain by 30dB.

Waves IDR Type 1 Ultra :

This noise shaping is flat until the exponential curve from 10kHz to 20kHz.

This noise shaping is flat until the exponential curve from 10kHz to 20kHz.

Waves IDR Type 1 Ultra stays flat until about 10kHz. At which point it quickly and exponentially slopes upward 40dB until it reaches 20kHz.

As you can see, different dithering and noise shaping types accentuate and attenuate different frequencies. Each type may work better for a specific master and depends on the instrumentation used in the mix.

In certain situations, you may not need dithering and the noise shaping that comes along with it.

Here are Some Situations in Which You Don’t Need Dithering and Noise Shaping:

Here is How You Can Determine if Quantization Noise, or the Noise from Dithering is Louder:

Step 1: Export Your Master from 24-bits to 16-bits without Dithering

Step 2: Export Your Master from 24-bits to 16-bits with Dithering

Step 3: Import Both of Your Masters into Your DAW

Step 4: Align these Two Masters with Your Original 24-bit Master

Step 5: Use a Null Test and a LUFS Meter to Measure the Differences

Step 6: Determine Which Master Results in the Least Amount of Noise

This test may seem difficult, but if you’d like to see how to do it, check out our video and blog on the topic:

What is Dithering?

The video shows how you can do this test on your own.

If you’re finding this whole thing to be a bit more than what you bargained for, you can always send us your mix here:

Get a Free Mastered Sample of Your Mix

We’ll master it for you for free, and send you a sample of that master.

Now that we understand what noise shaping is, and how it’s essentially white noise with additive and subtractive equalization, we can use these two tools to recreate some of the popular dithering plugins.

How to Create Your Own Dithering and Noise Shaping

Step 1: Use a Test Oscillator to create white noise. At this point, you’ve essentially already created a flat dither. Granted you’d have to blend this into your master, but it’s the same noise used for the dithering process.

Any white noise generator will work well.

Any white noise generator will work well.

Step 2 : Add an equalizer after the test oscillator. With the Fletcher-Munson curve in mind, begin attenuated and accentuating specific amplitudes.

Choose an EQ that doesn't color or distort the sound.

Choose an EQ that doesn't color or distort the sound.

Since dithering is typically very quiet, I’ll model my noise shaping after the 20 Phon curve.

Step 3: To do this, attenuate 3kHz to 4kHz by roughly 8-10dB.

Reference the Fletcher-Munson curve to see why this EQ is being made.

Reference the Fletcher-Munson curve to see why this EQ is being made.

Step 4: Amplify 1.5kHz by roughly 5dB.

Our ears are less sensitive to 1.5kHz.

Our ears are less sensitive to 1.5kHz.

Step 5: Amplify 20kHz by about 15dB with a bell or shelf filter. This way you create a gradual increase in amplitude.

Our ears are significantly less sensitive to 15kHz. plus.

Our ears are significantly less sensitive to 15kHz. plus.

If you’d like you can export this noise and use it later, or save the settings for future use. Be sure that this noise is the last thing added prior to exporting your track, otherwise, you may process it in an unintended way.

Experiment with this technique until you find noise shaping that works well for you and your master’s needs. Also, it may make things easier if you use a frequency analyzer after your equalizer so you can measure how your noise shaping is affecting the frequency response.

Use a frequency analyzer to measure and visualize your noise shaping.

Use a frequency analyzer to measure and visualize your noise shaping.

Also, it is important to use an equalizer that doesn't introduce any distortion or harmonic generation. As you can imagine, this would interfere with any noise shaping you wished to accomplish.

Conclusion

Noise shaping may seem somewhat straight forward, but the principles behind it influence aspects of digital recording, perceptual sciences, and everything influenced by and dependent upon those fields.

Understanding noise shaping means understanding how the human ear works, and how that affects mixing and mastering.

Understanding dithering means knowing the principles of digital recording, quantization, and phase relationships when it comes to understanding quantization noise, and how to perform the necessary testing detailed above.

Quickly, let’s recap everything detailed here for a synopsis of what dithering is, how noise shaping relates, and how the unique way our ears perceive sound ties in.

First, an analog signal is converted to a digital signal. The amplitude is encoded using quantization.

Quantization occurs during the analog to digital conversion process.

Quantization occurs during the analog to digital conversion process.

The bit depth details the number of available values the analog’s amplitude can be quantized to during the A/D conversion.

The difference between the analog signal’s amplitude and the value the amplitude is rounded to is called quantization error. This error causes noise to exist in the recording.

This noise is typically quiet but presents itself as unpleasant high order harmonics when loud enough. Dithering is used to mask this noise and randomize any harmonics.

Noise shaping is the method of equalizing dithering noise. Typically dithering noise is loud enough to be perceived at bit depths of 16 and lower.

Attenuating frequencies that are easy to hear, and amplifying those that are harder to hear can remedy this issue.

Lastly, you can create your own dither and noise shaping using a white noise generator and equalization. Reference the Fletcher-Munson curve in the “What is the Fletcher-Munson Curve?” or “How to Create Your Own Dithering and Noise Shaping” sections to see how you can accomplish this.

If you’re looking to have your music mastered, and perhaps you’d like to limit quantization noise by using analog mastering, send us your mix here:

Get a Free Mastered Sample of Your Mix

We’ll master it for you and send you a free mastered sample of that mix.

Do you use dithering and noise shaping when mastering?



Ready to make your mixes sound 10 times better, 10 times faster...

You're literally one step away from 10 times better sound.

The best part is... it's risk-free, if we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it.

START NOWREAD OUR REVIEWS

Review by Joel S.

If you're looking for great mastering, Sage is where you need to be. I've been working with Sage for years - they do an amazing job and are really easy to work with.

They actually care about your project and want it to sound its best just as much as you do. I'm always excited to get a song or project back from mastering. I've tried many mastering companies, and Sage is by far the best.

If you're serious about your music, it's worth checking them out; you won't be disappointed - they make your mixes sound balanced and professional.

They also offer mixing feedback to help improve your mixes and mixing and mastering education courses to help improve your sound. Shout out to Sage Audio! you can't go wrong - like I said, if you're serious about your music, this is your studio.

Review by April K.

I've been getting my masters done by Sage Audio for the past 4 years now, and I've tried multiple places in my 15 years in the music business. Sage Audio is the only one that has given me the quality I love!

Their mastering membership is an excellent deal for anyone looking for professional mastering and full customer service. Also, I never had an issue with submitting new mix versions for remastering or asking for too many revisions - they have always been very respectful about remastering new mixes and making any adjustments I wanted. I'm staying with Sage, no need to look further! Best masters out there!

Review by Justin G.

Sage Audio is by far the best audio engineering company I've found. I've been with them for 8 years, and it's clear that they set the bar high in regard to mastering services. Their online platform makes it easy to upload tracks and communicate directly with your own dedicated mastering engineer, and their customer service is excellent.

Overall, the sound achieved by Sage Audio engineers is awesome. Their mastering brings out the best in each track - improving clarity, depth, and impact - and they focus on crafting personalized masters that are specific to your needs.

Another thing that sets Sage Audio apart from other mastering services is that the mastering is actually done with your dedicated mastering engineer and not some sort of AI software, and you get full customer service and feedback on your mixes too.

Their commitment to delivering top-tier mastering while maintaining consistent communication shows how much they care about their clients' music. For anyone looking for a personalized online mastering that combines top-level quality with excellent customer service, look no further than Sage Audio.

Review by James T.

The engineers at Sage Audio could not have made my first commercial audio experience any better! Every time I emailed to get a question answered, I worked with the same person consistently.

They know what they are doing; after listening to my masters on numerous systems, I heard my music in a whole new light. My bass and kick were tighter, not muddy, and hit with the "grit" that I intended. My mids and highs were clear, vibrant, and presented well on all stereos and devices.

I could have never achieved this level of quality without their diligent minds and professional know-how! If you are looking to get your project up to a commercial level while meeting a budget, Sage Audio is the place to go!

Review by Rebecca D.

Sage Audio is by far the best mastering service! They are the most professional, kind, and loyal people. Every song they mastered was spot on!

For artists looking to have their music mastered, they have an awesome and affordable mastering membership and are dedicated to making every mix sound like a professional master. Thank you, Sage Audio, for transforming my music!

Review by Daniel S.

The last ten years of my audio mixing career have been plagued by frustration, self-doubt, and compulsive shopping for magic game-changing plugins that can fix my poor mixes... guess what... it was all wasted time and money; I was shooting in the dark.

Until now.

I had heard about Sage Audio a long time ago, but at that time, their pricing seemed too expensive - how wrong I was.

Firstly, there is no substitute for hard work; you must do your part; what this service gave me was perspective - what's different about this master from my own? why? what am I missing? how can I improve my final mixdown in order to get the best possible master?

The included courses are really useful and well explained, but to me, the real power is the community of engineers offering their feedback; there's nothing like a second set of ears, or a lot of sets of ears! Getting other engineers' advice is priceless, and fixing common problems suddenly became very simple.

The best part is that I have made a bunch of mixes on my own now and am starting to get incredibly good responses - my confidence is up, with no additional plugins, no new DAW, not even new monitors.

I've been a Sage Audio member for about 9 months now, and all services are excellent. The 1-on-1 mixing feedback is incredibly helpful, and the professional community is way more active than I could have imagined. I'll be here for the long haul. So, if you're ready to take your music to the next level and change a lot of misconceptions, this is your place!

Review by Thomas E.

I am a musician and songwriter with decent recording skills, but I could never get my final mixes mastered to where the EQ, volume, and clarity sounded good on all playback systems without distortion.

I did extensive research on mastering and tried expensive studio headphones, but I never quite "mastered" mastering. It was very frustrating and took way too much time away from my music.

Then I found Sage Audio, and it sounded like just the service I needed at a reasonable price, so I joined their membership.

It was a game-changing decision. They always respond quickly and are focused on pleasing their customers. They mastered several of my songs, and they all came out perfect.

One of them took three takes because I had to change some levels and panning, but each time, they said, "No problem, we want you to be 100% happy with the final master."

They even asked for ways to improve their service, and they have a unique service where you can upload your mixes and receive feedback directly from them for improvement. I also found in the community, there are great musicians, singers, and songwriters to collaborate with for future projects.

In summary, Sage Audio has saved me a lot of time and provided great masters for my songs, way better than I could have ever done! I give them my highest recommendation.

Review by Frank B.

I've been using Sage Audio for a while now and have been very pleased with their professionalism and quality of work!

I'm NOT new to the audio production world and have been mixing and self-mastering for over a decade. I've used Grammy-winning mastering engineers as well as online AI-driven mastering services, so I know the full range of mastering services available to artists and their producers.

What sets Sage apart, IMO, and, in my experience, is that they are very customer-centric and will do almost anything to make the customer happy with their work. An example is a recent master I wasn't 100% happy with because it was too compressed for Classical material. They jumped right on it, giving me another more gently compressed master, which I'm delighted with. This was a NO EXTRA CHARGE. I know from experience that this isn't the norm in this industry, where egos prevail.

An example of Sage's superior work is when a client I'm working with wanted proof that it was better than a well-known, low-cost AI-driven mastering service. While my instructions to both Sage and the online service were close, only Sage had a human to interpret some of the instructions. As a result, the Sage master was considerably LOUDER and had more HEADROOM to boot. You can't ask for much more for a Pop song.

In summary, I'd recommend Sage to anyone looking for professional mastering for their upcoming release.

Give them a shot. I'm sure you'll be pleased.

Review by Dan Y.

Sage Audio has been a lifesaver for me. Mastering was my weakest point, and I only wish I could've found them sooner. I have used their services for the last 6 months and have also recommended them to several of my musician friends. Every track I send comes back sounding brilliant.

I once experimented by mastering one of my songs by myself, by another leading mastering studio, and also by Sage Audio. Sage's master was hands-down the best: clear, loud, yet dynamic, and the overall sound was smooth. I can say with 100% confidence Sage Audio is the best mastering service around.

It's also a pleasure connecting with their team on a personal level; they are very attentive to details and respond fast.

Review by Irene F.

I found Sage Audio when I was searching for a company that could master my original songs. My initial email was responded to in less than ten minutes. I explained my situation, then created an account and uploaded my mix for mastering.

I let my engineer know what was bothering me in the song and what I would like it to sound like. In a short time, he sent me a notification email to download the master and asked if it was to my liking.

On first listen, it blew me away, as it contained everything I had asked for, and the sound was vibrant, clear, and, quite frankly, perfect. I've been with Sage Audio ever since - they're so easy to work with, friendly, eager to help, and highly professional. I would recommend them to anyone.

Review by Aaron C.

I first used Sage audio 3 years ago to get an album mastered. I hadn't used an outside service for mastering before, so I didn't know exactly what to expect, but I had learned a lot from the Sage Audio YouTube channel and liked the clear, concise way the videos explained various audio principles, so I felt comfortable using their services.

Not only did the masters sound amazing (dynamic, but still as loud as I wanted), but the engineer answered all of my questions and responded to my emails almost immediately.

To add to that, considering all the services you get with the membership is an incredible deal - it Includes mastering, mixing feedback, courses, and community. It's everything you need, and their customer service is top-notch.

As good as their YouTube videos are, I knew this would be a fantastic resource; as a college professor myself, I recognize excellent instruction, and Sage has a knack for breaking down complex processes and demonstrating how plugins work in concise bursts that never overwhelm the learner.

More importantly, you will come to understand when to use the tools in your arsenal and why to do so. You, thus, are learning how to ask better questions of the mastering engineers that you have access to through your membership, and ultimately, you are being empowered to become an engineer yourself!

Review by John G.

I started using Sage Audio to master my songs about three to four years ago - I wish I had found them earlier. Their mastering makes my mixes sound like professional songs, and they're a delight to work with.

Also, they have a very active community of musicians, producers, and engineers, along with mixing and mastering courses - which have provided me with so much useful information. On top of that, the mixing feedback is excellent, and they continually provide thoughtful suggestions, which I've found invaluable for improving my mixes. It's worth checking them out - you will not be disappointed.

Review by Brandon T.

I had Sage Audio master my last 3 albums, and I plan to use them for my next release too. They do an exceptional job of creating balance and clarity for each project, and they are so friendly and helpful when it comes to answering questions and offering suggestions.

Their experience is invaluable, and they have truly insightful feedback when it comes to mixing and mastering. I have tried other companies in the past and came back to Sage to get that professionally polished sound every time.

Review by Ben V.

A few months ago, a friend of mine recommended I try Sage Audio for my final master's. Being a mix engineer myself, I was hesitant at first due to the fact that in the past, when using online mastering, I found that no engineer would care for the track as much as I would.

Knowing the basic rule that you always want to have another set of ears to master anything you've mixed, I realized I had hit a plateau in how far I could take my final master. To my surprise, Sage and the team took my master's to a level I could not reach, both dynamically and sonically.

I'm a full-time artist who is constantly recording, releasing, and traveling. The burden that the Sage team has taken off my shoulders by being a trustworthy mastering service is tremendous.

They have provided me with quick turnarounds while out of the country to meet deadlines for releases and are understanding & receptive when I request changes after hearing a master, even going as far as to follow up with me, confirming that I am 100% happy with the final master, quoting, "I'm not happy unless you're happy."

Another benefit to Sage Audio is their library of mixing and mastering tutorials. Any good sound engineer knows that there are a million ways to reach a rich, dynamic final mix or mastering and that you're never done learning how to engineer. Sage's courses offer a great refresher on fundamentals and a clear understanding of complex techniques to help push you as an engineer.

Cheers Sage, thanks for the excellent service!

Review by Charlie E.

My writing partner and I have recorded and mixed 2 albums and a few singles, the first 2 albums we did were mastered by a different company. The masters were ok, but from that experience, we developed a better and more critical understanding of the mastering process.

Upon preparing to have our 3th album mastered, we did some research and exploration for other mastering options and found Sage Audio - which is where we had our latest album mastered.

We were both very much impressed with the work, the communication, and the willingness to create the exact sound we wanted for the album. We definitely heard a difference in the mastering - Sage Audio masters are clean, clear, and professional.

On top of that, we really enjoyed receiving mixing feedback, which was really helpful for making adjustments to bring the most out of our mixes before sending for mastering. For anyone seeking true audio professionals, I recommend Sage Audio!

Review by Sam V.

Sage Audio mastering engineers are the best I've ever worked with! I've been an Artist, Songwriter & Producer for over 12 years, and believe me, over the years, I've worked with several studios and countless engineers. But since I connected with Sage Audio, those days are over. I took a chance on something new - sent my first mix to see how it would go, and they didn't waste any time lol, they responded the very next day, and the master I got back far exceeded my expectations.

The level of quality and attention to detail was impressive. It was everything & more than what I hoped for, and now I will never trust my mixes in any other hands. They've quickly become my number 1 go-to-guys for mastering, hands down.

Not to mention, they also give you in-depth mixing feedback to help you improve your mixes before sending them for mastering. You can't go wrong with Sage Audio. These guys definitely deserve all the credit in the world. I would strongly recommend them to anyone out there looking for solid professionals to polish your mix. I can personally promise you, Sage Audio will deliver every time!

Review by Ryan B.

I've been using Sage Audio for mastering my tracks over the past year and a half, and they've been great on every front.

If I need a track mastered within a week, they usually get back to me with a high-quality finished master within a few days, and the cost is negligible compared to what some other studios are charging.

They also have an active community, and their mixing feedback option is super helpful; their suggestions are specific, revealing, and accurate.

I highly recommend them if you're a musician, producer, or mixing engineer who needs that last bit of polish before you release. They're worth every penny.

START NOW

LISTEN TO OUR SAMPLES

pop / country
Meghan Linsey
pop
Savannah Stewart
county / pop
Cody Belew
pop / rock
Bree
pop / indie
Alex Saad
country
Tyler Cain
pop / soft-rock
Joel Schisler
pop / international
AJ Castillo
country
Something Distant
pop / rock / indie
The Last Ride
indie
Maudlin Strangers
hip-hop
Futuristic
pop
Chelsea Lankes
electronic
Mizer & Goetz (Remix)
jazz
Mike Goudreau
pop / electronic
JNGL
indie / rock
The Gills
pop
Melissa Vanfleet
electronic
Marcus Sezabo
pop
Cody Belew
indie
I Am Strikes
electronic
Dveloped
pop / country
Meghan Linsey
pop / rock
Bree
pop / international
Tulus
electronic
Psilodump
rock / hard-rock
Wendy Icon
hip-hop
Necro & DMC
hip-hop
Brent Perry
hip-hop
Futuristic
pop
April Kry
pop
Shamina
rock
Guy Franklin
country
Chris James
rock
All Hands
pop / rock / indie
Kenzie Gregg
hip-hop
Litkaby
rock
Prospect
jazz
Mike Goudreau
soundtrack
Nicolas Giard
soundtrack
Phoenix Music Group
jazz
Richard Keller
electronic
Terra Lumina
soundtrack
Bear & Cat
pop / jazz / blues
Joel Schisler
electronic / pop
Alecs
electronic
Ethan
electronic / dubstep
Mad Mikey
indie
The Rhine Tones
hard-rock
Element Of Chaos
hard-rock
Kevin Carter
international / pop
Gilbert Pohan
pop
Justin Garner

Ready to make your mixes sound 10 times better, 10 times faster...

The best part is... it's risk-free, if we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it.

HERE'S WHAT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR SAGE AUDIO MEMBERSHIP

Private 1-on-1 mixing feedback directly from us

Custom mastering service tailored to your specific sound

Access to our flagship 23-video mixing course, including walkthrough sessions for 8 genres, featuring mixing chains with free and paid plugins — Included multitracks for mixing practice

Access to our flagship 19-video mastering course, including walkthrough sessions for 8 genres, featuring mixing chains with free and paid plugins — Included unmastered mixes for mastering practice

Access to the thriving Sage Audio community for discussions and networking

No commitments

If we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it, so it's risk-free

What's the Endgame?... You have mixes that sound 10 times better — songs you're proud of that make people say "Wow."

We guarantee 10 times better sound, or you don't pay for it, so it's risk-free. Members get 1-on-1 mixing feedback, mastering service, courses & access to our thriving community. That’s about it.

If you want to transform your mixes from a source of pain and struggle to a source of pleasure and fulfillment, JOIN NOW. The struggle stops now. START NOW